You accused Ryland of using Yoko Ono for pornography. This would be based on the idea that Yoko Ono is Japanese and I am his son. Pornography in principle is consensual. The consumer isn’t really doing anything in a pornographic film. In principle the actor and actress in a pornographic film enjoy each others company and hope to make money selling the images of this pleasure. How therefore does looking at pornography amount to using anybody, much less my father using Yoko Ono? Sex tapes were made of me as a hostage child, as a neurobedient wage slave with nowhere to run, of deaf Jeannie’s rape. Sounds more like me being used by Yoko Ono. Problem is Yoko Ono, by ideology, can only be victim.
The implacable ruthlessness of Yoko Ono admits no defense for the non-accused. We’ve seen that now for many decades. Paul McCartney objected to seeing me with Midori Goto and translated what he said was an identity crime aimed at Reagan into what he considered a justified revenge commited in the name of AIDS victims by fulfilling the script using me as a sacrificial souvenir. That’s where the situation stands. Reasoning with British Labor and New York’s Government is not productive, but there remains the issue of public scrivening and accounts for a few members of family.
Seattle Queers settled on irrationality as a function of cruelty. Ayn Rand, the klukozoidal guru of Carnegie Mellon, where Seattle took their cues, wrote that the most terrible thing one of her protagonists could imagine is facing a beast of prey or ravaged, mindless criminal. You would say all sorts of profundities but nothing would get through. Solzenhitsyn once said that the paradox in American society is that freedom had led to an absence of spirituality. Our government construes this as a justification for torture since it leads to a more spiritual citizen.
The piracy of Peter Gabriel who admited that the staged and phony intercept of the letters in my home by their authors was theft called it justified theft, but he hasn’t actually made a reasonable case that to be true. Gabriel politicized a witness through manufacture and smear. Sexualization was used to push disenfranchisement into eminent domain. He claims that I was not a hostage, but rather that my dehumanization is an object lesson empowering the idea of justified theft, torture and rape. His cause is relativity. The reason Pnr. Gabriel isn’t going to acknowledge the fallacy and wrongheadedness of chicken fights between victims is that his whole operation depends upon that line of attack.
Having distinguished people like The King Family supporting what Pnr. Gabriel in Pittsburgh and for the AIDS Combine on Mt. Desert Island does not therefore mean that it actually stands up as a justification for child rape. Jeannie was legally a child when Gabriel punisher’d her from his office at Amnesty International, claiming that in his chicken fight ledger she is less a victim, suffering orphan status, Downs Syndrome, epilepsy, abandonment, and deafness, than an AIDS victim is, hence his generous act of rape should be extolled as the munificence of a great mind at work, reconciling unknowable forces. Indeed, one of his music magazines had a picture of him at WOMAD dancing frenetically with the caption: He has the whole world in his pants.
Gabriel had as his motivation the extreme humiliation of Jimmy Crary. Hating the idea of me and Midori Goto, he created an assassination pussyball scenario that in order for her to earn her life and mine she would have to provider his faction her virginity and five abortions in order to humiliate me about the way I was tortured by a gang who chalked up points on me through a sickening blood tree game of hit and run attack prostitution. This vindictive idea had as its claim to be a morality statement showing the higher virtue of Fundamentalism. Meanwhile, however, he also ransacked me for anything I suggested as being religious with a hostile Reformation attitude, as though meditation on the beyond was punishable by death.
There is significant question of course if this wasn’t an idea that originated in Midori Goto’s movement. Her movement is an Ark of Stereotypes, engendered perhaps in part by Edward Said’s nasty concept of “Orientalism” as regarding the exotic otherness of Asian women as inferiors allowing Yoko Ono to invert this idea by applying Lennon’s supremacism to her egological caste. Midori Goto became a Godhead leading the sexual annihilation of a symbolic Midwestern white family and her partnership with Barack Obama a stance of militancy shrewdly offering AIDS victims leadership they prefer as minorities, while mounting an intense offensive to protect the truly guilty.
Once a victim becomes politicized, no matter how compound the victimization, they are subject to Chappaquidick syndrome. It would take a genuinely sinister person to say that a victim of profound head injury was unbecoming because the injury led to drooling, but no matter how hard you try a drooling politician is unacceptable. Out of the hospital then and into the klieglight was New York’s refrain. Thanks to Ronald Reagan’s Teflon armor no Chappaquidicks stick when it comes to Pnr. Gabriel’s abuse of children.
Queers are operating in their irrational vindictiveness a Catch 22, inspired I’m sure by Christopher Hitchens it should be called Hitch 22. There is no way that I would want to be in the clutches of Midori Goto after the terribly offensive hate crimes she authored, yet the Queers need the idea that I am still interested in her to justify continued abuses beyond number and horror. So they have the Ultrahigh system that requires that I kowtow to the offender and they isolate me to the point, like Bobby Sands, where any humanity shown towards me, however poisoned the food in the outstretched hand, evokes the instinctive need for approval and friendship. There is, after all, no question that I never understood the magnitude of what was in the letters. Gabriel simply claims that the magnitude was in fact great and therefore I should be punished as responsible just because I’m what Tom Gordon called “a convenient thing to hate.”
In creating their politicized witness, Gabriel resorted to claims that I am greedy. Hard to say where that comes from, since I’ve never lived above the poverty line. His ideas are somewhat convoluted. At the time of the staged and phony intercept in the mid-80’s a boy named Davy Jones introduced me to girls named Stephanie and Jocelyn. We know now that Jocelyn Elders was part of the Davey Jones locker division, Gordon Brown’s 25. Davey Jones was David Bowie’s original name. The Elders are a billionaire group that Pnr. Gabriel parties with. They deign to slip 15 minutes of fame to Nelson Mandela from time to time. When I got Section 8, my heart was poisoned and my housing counselor, a black woman named Mrs. Nelson said, “so I have that.” The idea of a top secret Los Vegas was also put into spin with the appointment of Janet Reno as Director of the F.B.I.
The counter-victim doesn’t have to be anybody in particular. They don’t even have to be a real AIDS victim. Hollywood can find anyone. The accusation that I am insensitive to children is really very empty. Everyone in psychiatry privately knows that the reason I’m kept away from children is that I am an old softy and would have a nervous breakdown. Even though they deny it, I went through with Mt. Desert Island in sympathy with the AIDS victims. They were panicked into self-destruction purposefully. The horrid cartel of Cornell West went beyond terroristic defilement and sought to sabotague historic records. Pnr. Gabriel had hoped that the truth about Sean Strub, Mt. Desert Island and 911 would remain as obscure as the myth of Atlantis.
Ultimately the claim that I owe anything to AIDS victims is erroneous. I am legally entitled not to accept being given a role in a farce. What I owe society is the payment of taxes. For a hostage taking system to say that they want my work and half of my income amounts to a larceny system that refuses to severe from its prey. The University of Washington see an opportunity to keep me here through poverty by magnifying my dependency on their scientific ability to deal with advanced criminal experimentation. There is no doubt that what is being done to me is extremely criminal misconduct. I consider it a tragedy for our communities and our understanding of the humanities. It’s a mercenary enterprise. Sean Strub was never a legitimate intellectual leader. It’s too bad Seattle went this road of abusing a victim of torture. The level of depradation they think is togetherness is unspeakable, a vile burlesque of hippydom created by the trickery of Godspell.
It really does I think show in part the danger that came in forgiving the war in Vietnam. The only rational response to the war is that it was unspeakable and unforgiveable. Refusal to deal with it that way led to relativism that now states: Oh, you were waterboarded, aw, ain’t that sad, to tax paying citizens. Obstructing me as a person is a dangerously pruerile objective. The crime itself an attempt to use AIDS as a catalyst to create Nazi Godlaw. The queers went along with it because of British rock stars. It’s eerie jazz. What they’ve already done is unforgivable. To think that to rationalize it they kick around the word “empathy”!
We should have suspected that behind the murder of JFK was an attempt to introduce mysticism. The idea of survival as a sacred defeat allows them to convene a cycle of victimization that is extremely profound. Recognition of the other’s humanity is a serious psychological problem for Aaron Dixon. The basis whereby Black Republicans break faith with the NAACP is to me beyond question. The issue in the humanities is the dignity of the human mind and soul, not race. You’d think Muslims at least would understand that, since they understand the meaning of man being made in the image of God to mean that the mind is in the image of God, not the body.
Do they offer severance in their theft? No, they want me to live out the lies they’ve told about me. It seems to me a good idea for people in Government to look for three categories in this affair: Those in the loop, those outside the loop, and those willing to oppose the loop. The strategy seems to have been a truly vicious revenge by the segregationists, a pussyball eugenic ordeal. It’s not safe to ignor, although it is healthier to learn to ignor them when they seek to promote themselves. Obviously, compassion fatigue is much higher in a deaf victim of compound torture and personal abuse injuries. Obvious, that is, to everyone but the murderer responsible.
It’s interesting to me that a skinhead named Brent Coldiron was the source of the fluxus refrain: What did I do to deserve this? In other words, the status of victim as a medium for feudalism and social abuse originated with a lumberjack skinhead from Toledo, Ohio. How this could be is reasonable to consider but impossible to conclude. I suspect that behind Sean Strub and Adam Eisenstat, the leader of the band Bad Martyrs who befriended Coldiron, was Ed Meese.
The an English have insisted on hearing from me, while sowing the poisonous fear that if America doesn’t surrender to the caprice of the British rock world Ringo will launch nukes next. They pinned my private comments up on Robert Fripp’s bulletin board heedless of the fact that they were jeopardizing a victim of child torture, and insisted that if I did not write what came blasting through the neuroplasm they would git me. These lopers are not really affirming the free speech movement by the way.
What is in reach for the average citizen when the government insists on behaving this way? I was after all at Pitt News simply asking questions like wouldn’t Central America be benefited more by buying them ballot boxes that worked than weapons, not framing that paranoid Reagan.
thechinatowngazetteer 